Infrared LEDs are used in eye trackers, security cameras, depth
sensors, and many other devices, and properly designed systems can
use them safely and effectively. Because infrared light is invisible,
it is helpful to verify the output of unfamiliar or modified emitters.
This guide explains the factors that affect exposure and how to
evaluate an infrared setup.
Infrared lighting is a practical and widely used part of many
commercial eye trackers. Most low-power systems are designed to keep
exposure within appropriate limits. Still, infrared sources can vary,
and strong exposure can heat tissue in the eye. Because
near-infrared light is invisible, measuring an unfamiliar setup is
more reliable than judging its brightness by sight or camera phone.
Understanding practical exposure limits
Irradiance describes radiant power arriving at a surface per unit
area. It is commonly measured in watts per square meter
(W/m²) or milliwatts per square centimeter
(mW/cm²).
10 W/m² (1 mW/cm²)
IEC 62471
provides a framework for evaluating the photobiological
safety of lamps and lamp systems, including infrared sources. A value
such as 100 W/m² (10 mW/cm²) can be useful as
a simplified screening reference in a demonstration, but it is not a
universal pass-or-fail limit for every infrared LED.
A proper assessment depends on the emitter wavelength, exposure
duration, viewing distance, beam shape, apparent source size, and the
relevant hazard being evaluated. Consumer meters may also have
limited wavelength ranges or may respond differently to sunlight and
narrow-band LEDs. For any DIY system or product, assess the complete system
against an objective standard in repeatable conditions.
Example readings from common light sources
An infrared irradiance meter
can help compare sources under a consistent test setup. In one
informal experiment, a dark room produced a near-zero reading, a
monitor measured about 1 W/m² (0.1 mW/cm²),
and a fireplace measured approximately
10-15 W/m² (1-1.5 mW/cm²).
Indoor daylight varies substantially with the room and the direction
of light. Irradiance readings near windows range from several watts per
square meter to more than
100 W/m² (10 mW/cm²). Outdoor daylight
produces much higher meter readings in the 500+ W/m² (50 mW/cm²)
range, especially in direct sunlight.
These examples show why distance, direction, environment, and meter
range should be recorded with every measurement.
Do not look directly at the sun!
How LED shape changes irradiance
The optical shape of an LED affects how its output is distributed. A
domed LED can concentrate light into a narrower beam, while a
flat-top or diffused LED spreads the output across a wider area. A
coating can diffuse it further.
At a distance of five centimeters, three LEDs powered by the same
OV9281 camera module produced the following example readings:
Domed LED: approximately 10-15 W/m² (1-1.5 mW/cm²)
Sanded flat-top LED: approximately 3-4 W/m² (0.3-0.4 mW/cm²)
Painted flat-top LED: approximately 1-2 W/m² (0.1-0.2 mW/cm²)
These readings illustrate the effect of diffusion, but they do not
establish one limit for every distance or exposure duration. Diffusion
and sensible placement can help reduce concentrated output, while
moving an emitter closer to the eye increases irradiance. If you
modify an LED, measure the finished setup so you know how it performs.
Driving current helps determine output
LED output is strongly related to driving current. Two products using
visually identical LEDs can produce very different irradiance if
their circuits supply different current or use different pulse
patterns.
Checking average current, peak pulse current, and duty cycle makes it
easier to choose an appropriate emitter and compare setups. Reliable
current limiting also helps keep output predictable during use.
How to evaluate an infrared emitter
Use an irradiance meter such as the one in the image below
to measure the device in its intended configuration, not only
the LED by itself. It is best to have a reference LED and to
test at the closest realistic viewing distance. A repeatable
measurement provides useful reassurance that the setup is behaving
as intended.
In the following image, I evaluate the pupil labs camera against
the GC0308 camera by holding both cameras directly over the meter sensor
within one minute over each other at the same distance.
Pupil labs and GC0308 irradiance measurements
Key takeaway
Infrared LEDs are useful, efficient tools for eye tracking and many
other applications. Choosing a modest-output source, using sensible
distance and diffusion, and checking the complete system against a
known source with an irradiance meter can make an IR setup both
practical and reassuring to use.
This page is educational and does not replace a formal safety
assessment or professional advice.